TIME SHORT FOR CLIMATE PACT: NEWS
OSLO, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Time is short to work out a new treaty to fight global warming as planned by the end of 2009 because drafts of a deal must be ready in less than a year, the U.N.'s top climate change official said on Wednesday.
Negotiators from almost 200 nations will meet in Accra, Ghana, from Aug. 21-27 to discuss elements of a future pact such as deeper cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, ways to slow deforestation and aid for developing nations to adapt.
"Time is short," Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat, told Reuters of a timetable meant to end with agreement on a new climate treaty to succeed the existing Kyoto Protocol at a meeting in Copenhagen in late 2009.
"If you are going to negotiate something in Copenhagen in December in 2009 the elements of that negotiation have to be available six months before," he said. So far, only vague proposals have been floated at the talks.
Asked about what Accra would achieve, de Boer said: "To make a squirrel analogy I hope we gather more nuts. I hope we get more specific proposals."
The talks are the third session this year to work out a pact to slow rising temperatures blamed by the U.N. Climate Panel on greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels that could bring desertification, shift monsoons, and raise world sea levels.
De Boer said he did not believe the collapse of the world trade talks last month and an economic slowdown in many rich nations would derail efforts to confront climate change.
"Business is still calling for clarity and ambition," he said. Many industries want to know the long-term rules to decide, for instance, whether to build a coal-fired power plant or a wind farm.
LOUDER VOICE
He said that the breakdown of the World Trade Organisation talks in Geneva illustrated that developing nations needed a stronger voice in international bodies, such as the U.N. Security Council.
"If you are asking major developing countries to engage on a topic like climate change in a serious way, don't they also deserve a serious place in the governance? I think that's something to think about," he said.
The Accra meeting will be the first since the Group of Eight industrialised nations agreed a vision last month of cutting world greenhouse gases by 50 percent by 2050.
De Boer said it was unclear, however, whether the 2050 target would help. He has called 2050 too distant and urged nearer-term goals to force politicians to act now, rather than leave cuts to a future generation.
"In order to know if it's a help or not I'd need clarity on a couple of things," he said, saying it was not clear if the vision of halving emissions would be non-binding or a firm goal.
And he noted that the G8 text did not name a base year for cuts -- the European Union favours 1990 but Japan wants it to be from current levels.
The base year makes a big difference because world greenhouse gas emissions leapt to 49 billion tonnes in 2004 from 39 billion in 1990, according to the U.N. Climate Panel.
The Kyoto Protocol binds all developed nations except the United States to cut emissions by an average of 5 percent by 2008-12 below 1990 levels. The new deal aims to include all countries in a successor pact that would start from 2013.
-- For Reuters latest environment blogs click on: http://blogs.reuters.com/environment/ (Editing by Mary Gabriel)
CDM PROJECT

(A few personal words:
Recently, I got an opportunity to attend a seminar on CDM Project. Many environment related matters like Kyoto Protocol, Climate Change etc. were also discussed there. I tried to collect something for my Dada friends. In sideline of the seminar I became closed to a faculty member. He called me to his hotel room after dinner. The 30 yr old beautiful bachelor greeted me breathtaking hugs, kisses & love in his room. Then giving some slides, he told, “Anita, some of my collections are here; world’s future is very dark, try to increase the awareness on environment amongst people.” His words are still resonating my ears. Some parts of those materials are reproduced here. - Anita)
INTRODUCTION
• CDM is a market based mechanism intended to achieve emission reductions with cost effectiveness by taking up environmental friendly projects in developing countries
• Through CDM, it was intended to achieve the twin objectives of sustainable development and reduction of GHGs
• The project based emission reductions can be sold to developed countries to achieve part of their emission reductions
• CDM is part of Kyoto Protocol under UNFCCC
Significance of CDM
• Achieve sustainable development
• Reduce impact on environment
• Additional stream of income through sale of emission reductions
• Reduce pollution levels or improve other environmental parameters
• Technology improvement
• Helps developed countries to achieve their emission reduction commitments
Threats of Climate Change
• Scientifically un-denied negative impacts
Until 2100, temperature raising is expected between 1.4 to 5.8 degree
Changing eco-systems
Melting glaciers
Rising sea level
Changing biodiversity
Changing household water consumption worldwide
More and hotter heat waves
More and different infection deceases
Threats of Climate Change
• Hundreds of millions of World’s most vulnerable people will see their lives and livelihoods jeopardized
• 30% of the World’s species are at risk of extinction
• Natural catastrophes have caused USD 75 billion of economic losses in 2007 and killed 15000 people and climate change is considered to be one of the causes for part of the damage
• The loss is 50% higher than USD 50 billion loss in 2006
• The absolute number of disasters have increased from 850 in 2006 to 950 in 2007
• Therefore, the efforts of the world body promoting steps for mitigating GHGs through the market mechanisms
MILLINEUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS
• Declared in the beginning of millennium, in September 2000
• Endorsed by 189 countries, Goals to be reached by 2015
1. Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
2. Achieve universal primary education
3. Promote gender equality and empower women
4. Reduce child mortality
5. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
6. Improve maternal health
7. Ensure environmental sustainability
8. Develop a global partnership for development
The UN FCC basics
• 191 Parties – near universal membership
• UNFCCC main features:
recognizes that the climate system is a shared resource whose stability is affected by emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases
sets an overall framework for intergovernmental efforts to tackle the challenge posed by climate change
UNFCC Objective
• to achieve stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.
• To strengthen the developed country commitments under the Convention, the Parties adopted Kyoto Protocol in 1997, which commits developed country Parties to return their emissions of greenhouse gases to an average of approximately 5.2% below 1990 levels over the period 2008-12.
GHG Potential
• Gases evolved during natural processes and also because of human activities
1. CO2 1
2. CH4 21
3. N2O 310
• Engineered gases
1. Hydro Fluro Carbons (HFC 23 -11700, HFC 125 -2800,HFC 134A -1300, HFC 152A -140)
2. Per Fluro Carbons ( Tetra Fluro Methane,CF4 -6300; Hexa Fluro Ethane,C2F6 -9200)
3. Sulphur Hexa Flouride SF6 -23900(Life time 3200 Years)
IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE
• Temperature increase of 0.4o c in last 100 years.
• Increase in monsoon seasonal rainfall across west coast, ap
• Decrease in monsoon in north east india, kerala
• Climate models predict 2 – 40 c by 2050s
International Response to Climate Change
Milestones
• 1979: First World Climate Conference
• 1988: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
• 1990: IPCC and Second WCC call for global treaty for climate change
• 1992: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted, in RIO, Earth summit, No binding targets
• 1994: UNFCCC entered into force
• 1997: COP3,Kyoto Protocol adopted
• 2001: COP7, Marrakesh Accords
• 2002: August 26th, India signs the protocol
• 2005: 16th February, Kyoto Protocol entered into force, binding targets
Kyoto Protocol
• Signed in 1997; but entry into Force on 16 February 2005 only
• Facilitates sustainable development & additional support to developing countries on adaptation
• Ratified by 175 parties by May 1977, ratified by Australia in Dec 2007
Major non-participants: USA
Individual, quantified emission targets for each industrialized country
Six greenhouse gases covered: CO2, CH4, N2O, HFC/PFC, SF6
INDIA & KYOTO
• India ratified kyoto protocol on 26th August 2002
• Hosting of cop-8 in Nov, 2002 at New Delhi
• Appointment of DNA ( national clean development mechanism authority as part of MOEF)
• Submitted indian national communication in 2004
• EB is represented by one member from india
Three Kyoto Mechanisms
• International Emission Trading (ET): exchange of emission allowances among industrialized Kyoto Protocol countries
• Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): credits for emissions avoided through sustainable development projects in developing countries
• Joint Implementation (JI): credits for emissions avoided through projects in Annex I countries
CDM Project Partners
• Industrialized countries (Annex I)
• Developing countries (Non-Annex I)
• Independent party for validation & verification
• Registration body
• Private business, governments, NGOs
CDM Objectives
• Twin objectives of CDM:
•
– Help Annex 1 countries meet their GHG emission reduction objectives in a cost-effective way
– Contribute to sustainable development of the host country
• Involvement of Annex 1 Parties (buyers/ investors) can take various forms:
– Most common: Purchase CERs from project proponent once they have been generated (typically, long-term forward purchase agreements)
– Less common: Investment in CDM project è receive (part of) CERs as return on investment
Cost of emission reduction
• Japan US$400 /tCO2e
• USA US$200 /tCO2e
• India US$ 25 /tCO2e
CDM Organization
• Rules, modalities and procedures of CDM are defined in:
– Kyoto Protocol (1997)
– Follow-up decisions of COP, especially Marrakech Accords (2001), and
– Decisions of CDM Executive Board
• CDM Executive Board:
– Responsible for further development of CDM rules, and supervising implementation
– Composed of 10 Members + 10 Alternates
– Reports to the Conference of the Parties (COP)
The CDM Project Stages
Design
Validation
Registration
Implementation
Monitoring/Reporting
Verification
Certification
Design a project in accordance to the criteria of the Kyoto protocol
Validation of the project by an independent body, assuring all Kyoto protocol requirements are met
Registration of the CDM Project by the registration body on the basis of the validation report
Implementing the project
Measure performance and baseline indicators, report
Verification through an independent third party of the GHG emission reduction
Based on the verification a certificate of emission reduction will be issued.
MINIMUM TIME TAKEN
• PIN/PDD 2 months
• Validation 2 months
• MOEF endorsement
& Registration with UNFCC 2 months
CDM ELIGIBILITY
Eligibility criteria for a CDM project :
The project shall contribute to the Sustainable Development of the host country
The project shall result in real, measurable and long term benefits in terms of climate change mitigation, and
The reductions must be additional to any that would have occurred without the project
QUALIFYING CRITERIA
• Project start date after January 2000
• Exceed regulatory standards
• No Leakage
• No double counting
ADDITIONALITY
PROJECT PROPONENTS have to demonstrate that under normal circumstances the project activity would not be implemented due to the existence of one or more barriers
• Investment barrier - Availability of a financially more viable alternative that would have led to higher emissions
• Technological barrier - Existence of a less technologically advanced alternative that involves lower risks due to the performance uncertainty or low market share of the new technology adopted for the project activity and so would have led to higher emissions
• Common practice barrier - Prevailing practice (Local tradition/Social conditions) or existing regulatory or policy requirements would have led to implementation of a technology with higher emissions
• Non economic barriers for CDM: Inadequate human capacity, policies, Legal frame works, Institutions
DOE
• The Designated Operational Entities (DOEs) are UNFCCC accredited agencies involved in validation and verification of CDM projects. Their primary role is to ensure that the project results in real, measurable, and long term emission reductions. The DOEs are thus, creating platform to start the commercial transaction on emission reduction by a project activity.
• The basis will be on additionality of the project activity, application of methodology, establishment of baseline and monitoring plan.
CALCULATIONS
Electrical Energy saving 1 KWH .8- .9 kg CO2
Power generation(WH/RE) 1 KWH 4 - 5 kg CO2
Coal saving 1 Kg 1.3-1.6 kg CO2
NG based power generation 1 KWH .35-.45kg CO2
NG burning/saving 1 Kg 2.4-2.5 kg CO2
Fuel oil saving 1 litre 3 -3.5 kg CO2
International Statistics
COUNTRY N0. OF PROJECTS
(1051) CER ISSUED
Millions
(140) EXPECTED CER UPTO 2012
Millions (214)
INDIA 337 39 30
CHINA 210 42 110
BRAZIL 133 20 18
MEXICO 105 4 7
CHILE 22 2 4
REPUBLIC OF KOREA 18 23 15
OTHERS 226 10 30
Bundling
• Bundling is possible for small-scale project activities provided activities are not a debundled component of a large scale project activity.
• Project activity is considered a debundled component if there is an already registered project activity or an application to register another small-scale project activity
– With the same project participants;
– Registered within the previous two years;
– Whose project boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the proposed small-scale afforestation or reforestation activity under the CDM at the closest point.
Carbon Market
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme started in January 2005 (10-16 billion euro/market)
• Currently, CERs trade below the price of EU allowances (entitlement to emit tCO2e). Reasons for this discount are, e.g.:
Delivery risk relating to CDM registration process and Kyoto Protocol
Performance risk of CDM projects (counterparty risk, country risk)
• More private sector companies are becoming interested in CERs (EU/UK/Japan/Canada)
• In the longer term, prices of EU allowances and CERs are likely to converge.
EU ETS
• The European Union set up a market in January 2005 under which about 12,000 factories and power stations are given carbon dioxide quotas. If they overshoot they can buy extra allowances in the market or pay a financial penalty; if they undershoot they can sell them.
• Largest CAP and trade system in the world. (Aggregate CAP on certain pollutants is imposed on group of emitters)
• Participants: 25 member states
• Gases: Direct CO2 only in First period
• CDM credits can be used for compliance.(1 EUA = 1 CER)
• Excludes Nuclear & Sinks
EU ETS
• Naming and shaming provision for violators
• Penalty Euro 40/tCO2e in First phase and Euro 100/tCO2e in Second phase
• 15,000 companies in EU ETS, incl. 300 of largest utilities, oil & gas companies
• Surplus emissions : UK: 27 m tons, Germany: 21 m tons
The World Bank Carbon Finance Program
The World Bank Carbon Finance Program has over USD 700 million for buying credits from CDM and JI projects. This includes:-
• World Bank Prototype Carbon Fund – USD 180m
• Bio Carbon Fund – USD 20m
• Community Development Carbon Fund – USD 120m
• Italian Carbon Fund – USD 150m
• Spanish Carbon Fund – USD 240m
CDM Market Potential
• Together, credits from the clean development mechanism (CDM) and joint implementation (JI) accounted for 226m tonnes worth nearly €2bn in the first half of 2006
• EU ETS is set to become a major driver of demand for CERs (1 EUA=1 CER)
– Second only to governmental JI/CDM purchase programs but becoming more important
• CERs offer the key benefit of being bankable for 2008-2012 (unlike EU allowances issued in 2005-07)
– CERs are the ideal instrument for ETS installations to hedge unexpected emissions increase
• Not all good news:
– uncertainty beyond 2012 creates problems for CDM/JI projects - limits market supply value from CERs - Climate change can’t be solved without the U.S - 25% of emissions
– Delay in ITL (International transaction log) – hinders CERs inflow in EUETS. (Purpose of ITL is to record and transfer of Kyoto units during the Kyoto period.)
Voluntary Carbon Market
• Voluntary marked is evolved due to growing concern of individuals and corporates about climate change
• The pressure of action began after the latest report of IPCC which brought out the threats of climate change
• Some of the drivers of voluntary market are :
Investors scrutiny of environmental performance of companies
Reputational risk in ignoring climate change issues
Push from consumers wanting more information on carbon foot print of their products and services
Preference of consumers for products and services with reduced carbon intensity
• Standards are in place for approval of the projects under voluntary carbon market
• Over 23.7 millions tonnes of CO2 were traded in 2006 in the voluntary market.
• The demand is estimated at 140 mtCO2 by 2020 under conservative estimate and it could be as high as 313 mtCO2 under optimistic estimation
Market uncertainties
• The existing protocol expires by 2012
• The EU has brought out a new energy and climate policy upto 2020 where they have projected
a 20% cut in emissions below 1990 level
to procure 20% of energy from RE sources and
the electricity sector has to buy allowances for every tonne of CO2 emitted from 2013
• The EU restricted use of CERs if no agreement is reached on Kyoto by 2012
India’s Position
• No obligation to reduce emissions UPTO 2012
• Per capita Carbon di-oxide emission of India is amongst the lowest in the world.
• Per capita emission in tones of CO2/annum in 2004
. India 1.2
. USA 20.6
. U.K 9.8
. China 3.8
. World 4.5
• Source: UNDP Human Development report 2007/08
Types of HCA CDM Projects
• Renewable energy (Wind, Biomass, Solar, Hydro)
• Switching to Alternate Fuels
• Energy Efficiency
• Waste Management
• Oil & Gas
• Agriculture
• Carbon Sequestration in Forests
Exclusions to Kyoto Protocol
• As per Intertanko, the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners, global shipping operations are responsible for emitting 1.2 billion tonnes of CO2, equivalent to 4.5% of worldwide emissions. This represents three times more than current estimates of 400 million tonnes, but also twice as much as the 650 million tonnes said to be emitted by aeroplanes.
• Shipping and Aviation sectors were left out of the Kyoto Protocol and, thus, out of the EU's Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
• Draft European legislation, presented in January with the aim of strengthening the ETS and extending it to new industrial sectors, provides for aviation to be included in the EU's carbon cap-and-trade scheme as of 2013 .
• Shipping produces less greenhouse gases per tonne-mile than any other form of transport but key issue is the growth in international trade , 90% of which is carried over the sea.
UPDATE ON CLIMATE CHANGE
• As per IPCC, preventing global mean temperature from rising above the critical threshold of 2 degrees centigrade in the 21st century will require radical cuts in greenhouse gas emissions of 80-90% by 2050.
• Bali Roadmap AT UN Conference on CC last December did not mention targets (25-40% reduction from 1990 emission levels by 2020 )to keep Washington in the negotiations for UN’s climate meeting in Copenhagen in December 2009.
• The G8’s LATEST endorsement of a 50% reduction in emissions by 2050 is grossly inadequate. The cut has no clear baseline. This declaration of intent is not binding. Japan and Canada, for instance, have retreated from their previous support for a regime of mandatory reductions.
• The European Union, while it continues to support a mandatory regime, does not appear to be willing to support the cuts of up to 80-90% by 2050 that are necessary to prevent irreversible large-scale climate change.
• Industrialised countries continue to hang on to the position that economic growth can be “decoupled” from energy use.
• “Rather than focusing, as some environmentalists do, on reducing the income and consumption of the rich world,” they assert “Technology can make the transition to a clean Green world a relatively painless one, with no major lifestyle change in the North and no change in the high-growth development paradigm in the South. This serves as a protective shield for global capitalism
• Voluntary cuts, technofixes, and carbon trading are desperate efforts to prevent the inevitable.
SOLUTION
• Opt for Sustainable development
• The emphasis in the definitions of sustainable development is on “Needs”
• Mahatma Gandhi’s statement that “The earth has enough for everyone’s need but not for anyone’s greed” is still relevant
• Implement in toto the theme of the current “World Environment Day”
Timelines
11 – 12 months for each project
Conclusions
• CDM presents interesting opportunities for India to generate additional revenue for project activities
• There are number of sectors under renewable energy and energy efficiency that could be explored
• Awareness is required on the procedures at the project source level – banking institutions which finance the projects
• The awareness helps in developing the documentation at appropriate time so that it will meet the requirements of the protocol.
(A collection by Anita de)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





Latest comments
@*dtcomment*@@*titolopost*@
@*nome*@